Funding for planning, research, and development of this site was provided by the Louisiana Board of Regents and their Distance Education Initiative (Supporting Electronic Learning and Empowering Campus Transitions [SELECT]). All members of the development team are sincerely grateful to the Board for its support throughout this initiative.

Top

LSU System Representatives

These individuals contributed their time, energy, knowledge, and expertise toward the development of this site.

• Principal Investigators
  • Dr. Pauline M. Rankin
    Dean, Division of Continuing Education, and Professor of Education
    Louisiana State University and A&M College
  • Tammy E. Adams
    Director, Center for Electronic Learning
    Louisiana State University and A&M College

Top

• Additional Representatives (listed by institution)

Resources

The following items served as resources in the development of this site.

Top

• Online Course

Resources Menu | Top

• Online Resources (Updated)

• Bylaws and regulations of the Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors, Chapter VII: Intellectual property. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from the Louisiana State University Web site:
  http://appl003.lsu.edu/oip/oip.nsf/$TextOnly/Chapter+VII?OpenDocument
• California Virtual Campus Region 2: Technical information. (2006). Retrieved November 20, 2006 from the California VirtualCamp Website
  http://pdc.cvc.edu/transition/index.asp?r=4
• Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching: Preventing academic dishonesty. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from University of California, Berkeley, Office of Educational Development Web site: http://teaching.berkeley.edu/bgd/prevent.html
• Hannum, Wallace. (2001). Instructional systems development: A Web site to accompany EDCI 211. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from University of North Carolina School of Education Web site:
• Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1994). Cooperative learning in technical courses: Procedures, pitfalls, and payoffs. ERIC Document Reproduction Service Report ED 377038. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Coopreport.html
• Long, L. W.,& Javidi, A. (2001). A comparison of course outcomes: Online distance learning versus traditional classroom settings. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from
• Mills, B. J. Managing and motivating!—Distance learning group activities. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/millis.htm
• Schulman, A. H., & Sims, R. L. (1999, June). Learning in an online format versus an in-class format: An experimental study. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from
  http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2090.cfm
• Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. Best practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Retrieved November 20, 2006 from http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/commadap.pdf
  http://www.sacscoc.org/pdf/commadap.pdf
• Spearman, R. J. (2000). Organizing online materials presentation. Retrieved January 12, 2004, fromhttp://listserv.utk.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0005&L=ci_users&T=0&P=560
• Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (1999). Course design factors influencing the success of online learning. Retrieved January 12, 2004, from http://www.distance-educator.com/dnews/Article9220-mode=thread-order0-threshold0.phtml

Resources Menu | Top

• Print Resources

• Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, A. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation, Inc./Wingspread.
• Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to Instructional Development. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Hanna, D. E., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 Practical tips for teaching online groups: Essentials of Web-based education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
• Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York: Merrill.
• Ko, S. & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
• McMillan, J. H., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). What theories of motivation say about why students learn. In R. J. Menges and M. D. Svinicki, College Teaching from Theory to Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 45 (pp. 39–51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Millis, B. J., & Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix: American Council of Education/Oryx Press.
• Pallhoff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communitities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Rhem, J. (1995). Deep/surface approaches to learning: An introduction. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(1), 1–3.
• Romiszowski, A. J. (1981). Designing instructional systems. London: Kogan Page.
• Willis, B. (1993). Distance education: A practical guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

• Other Resources

• Hutchinson, J. (2000). Module 4: Instructional design. Distance Education Certificate Program of the Louisiana Consortium for the Advancement of Distance Education (LaCADE).
• Pallhoff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1996). Presentations during the Teaching in Higher Education Forum (THE), Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.